PicScout announces Image Registry and licensing affiliate program

October 12, 2009 · 4 comments

1-680-22  stock photo of California, Gold Country, Miner, Marshall Gold Discovery State Historic Park

How do you identify an image you find on the web and find the copyright holder if you want to license the image?

This is the core question that concerns photographers when Orphan Works legislation is discussed, and the impetus behind the PhotoMetadata project to embed identifying information. Now a possible solution has emerged.

Last week Picscout announced a set of products which aim to solve this problem, at least for images in collections of stock agencies or others who sign up for PicScout Image IRC™ (Index, Registry and Connection !)

The idea is simple. IRC clients submit small versions of their entire collection which PicScout analyzes, fingerprints and indexes for visual recognition. Any candidate image can then be matched against the entire Registry. If a match is found then a prospective buyer can directly contact the distributor to license the image. Alternately, the collection owner can tell if any image found on the web is part of their collection and whether it has been properly licensed.

The result is two products: ImageExchange™ allows photo buyers who find an image anywhere, in their files, online, even scanned from a magazine, to search the registry (via an API or a plugin) and then directly connect with the distributor or copyright holder for rights clearance. Image Tracker™ allows collection owners to find unauthorized uses by looking through crawl data.

It sounds sweet in theory. If all commercial and professional photographs were in the registry then there would be no more Orphan Works problem for those images. In practice it is unlikely to be so easy, though without doubt this is a promising start.

Here are some of the potential problems I see:

  1. Cost

    Picscout currently only indexes collections of 30,000 images or more. Fewer than that is not considered cost effective, i.e. the overhead and setup is too expensive. Photographers with agency images will be covered, but where this leaves direct sellers with smaller collections, is unclear. There are definite advantages for PicScout to have uniform interfaces, particularly for the licensing/connection backend. Dealing with many different photographers with different levels of expertise could be time-consuming, so an arrangement with a technology platform like Photoshelter would be ideal. According to Picscout, participation in the Registry does not require subscribing to Image Tracker™ so collections can choose which platform features to subscribe to. Picscout would do well to make the cost of participation for distributors be as attractive as possible, particularly for early adopters.

  2. Reduced License Percent

    Picscout aims to take a percent of sales, noting on their site: “ImageExchange acts as an online affiliate program, sharing image-licensing income between PicScout and licensors.” This will reduce the percent that goes to the photographer. How the affiliate program will be automated is unclear since every distributor will need an automated interface. The exact percent or transaction fee taken has not been revealed, but should become apparent during the initial public testing period.

  3. Reduced Search through Distributor Sites

    If buyers find it easier to find images through web search they will move away from distributor sites for search, and only use the distributor site for the final licensing.

  4. Increased Microstock and RF Sales

    Since the vast majority of images available online are microstock or RF, these are the images buyers are likely to find. The premium RM collections of Getty, Corbis, even Alamy are not indexed by Google and so will not be found in web search, unless the images are licensed (or copied). One issue could be that distributors do not pursue RF or Micro copyright infringements, so have less incentive to participate in Image tracking for these images. (They could track them but low prices and multiple reuses make it less cost-effective).

  5. Free and Unindexed Images Highlighted

    If a buyer can tell which images are in the Registry they can also tell which images are not in the Registry and therefore can be copied with less risk. Over the long run, though, this might encourage greater Registry participation by distributors.

  6. Creative Commons Images

    PicScout has already indexed several million image licensed under Creative Commons. John Harrington has raised concerns about this, thinking it will encourage users not to pay for image use. Since Google search already allows search for CC images, this is not the real problem. Most CC Licenses offered on Flickr are NC so do not include commercial use; such licensing is assumed to be handled separately. The result though is perhaps worse, because individual owners usually have no idea how to structure a commercial copyright license. Rather than free images, the real downside with CC images in commercial uses is risk and liability.

  7. Efficiency

    Evaluating an entire page of thumbnails is time-consuming. Each thumbnail must be downloaded and analyzed by the PicScout servers before returning index comparison results, No doubt the PicScout engineers are hard at work solving this. However Google search is highly optimized for rapid response and any major drag on response time will discourage clients from using any add-on,. Single image testing is less work, but to be useful image search will need to analyze hundreds of images at a time.

  8. Acceptance

    The long-term success of IRC depends on buy-in from stock distributors, photographers and photo buyers. The more images online, the better the buyer experience and the more widespread acceptance there will be. It will take time to build up a critical mass of contributing agencies, but the greater the number of participants, the better the chances will be for success.

In summary, though there is much to be seen in the details, the PicScout move is a promising first step in identifying and facilitating licensing of images on the web. Other competitors will no doubt arise. If there is widespread adoption of efficient and comprehensive Image Registries, then photographers and photo buyers alike will benefit.

[UPDATE Oct 13: PicScout announced today the first set of collections in the IRC: Time Life Pictures, Aflo, Dreamstime, Glow Images, Maground, Masterfile, Mauritius Images, PlainPicture, SeaPics, and Trunk Archive including both RM, RF and micro images.

Hopefully they’ll be able to sign Getty Corbis and Alamy. It will be interesting to see how they fare with the large micro agencies like iStockPhoto and Shutterstock.

But so far no news of a link with Photoshelter so that individual photographers can participate.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 BenDamond November 25, 2009 at 11:22 am

Great article, very nice information, I guess there are a lots of scammers or thieths in this world who like to profit of other peoples work, that thing is not that nice and I hope someday this things stop.

Clickbooth Affiliate Network Program


2 backlinks November 18, 2009 at 3:37 pm

nice post, thanks for the share!


3 Randy Taylor October 23, 2009 at 4:14 am

PicScout’s Image IRC is similar to the patent-pending technology of The Copyright Registry at Now that PicScout has entered the registry market, a comparison of services would benefit photographers. Here’s a starting point:

1. Cost is free for single images. It costs $25 per year for photographers and agencies who want to bulk upload up to a million image URLs at a time. (No images are uploaded or stored at, only the fingerprints from submitted URLs.)

2. Reduced License Percent
With, photographers keep 100% of licensing fees by adding an ecommerce link to whatever website or agency they choose. It’s noteworthy that earlier in 2009, APA very publicly and strenuously objected to the possibility that someday registries might combine image licensing with registration, which PicScout has now announced.

3. Reduced Search through Distributor Sites does not offer search of images. It does not want to inadvertently create a database of orphaned works. Buyers must have the image on their hard drive or be at a web site with an image of interest to initiate C-Registry’s unique process to know who owns or represents it.

4. Increased Microstock and RF Sales
Whereas PicScout has focused until now on catching infringers, the mission of is to counter the effects of orphan works legislation that is evolving globally. Every uncredited, unattributed, altered, stolen image of the three trillion images online can link back to its rightful owner if the image is registered in the database.

5. Free and Unindexed Images Highlighted
When a buyer or infringer checks to see if an image is registered with, the image fingerprint is added by default. So, a user never finds an image that’s not already in the database. The unique image recognition technology of suggests possible owners if an exact match is not found, which makes it very difficult to use to circumvent copyright laws.

6. Creative Commons Images has already registered many millions of images. Its goal is to register all images that have commercial or editorial value, including those of non-professionals. C-Registry believes that protecting professional images is merely a first step since infringers will move to the next available target, like robbing the neighbor’s house if yours is alarmed.

7. Efficiency
Evaluating fingerprints “on the fly” requires a fraction of a second per image, regardless of which process is used. Good software programming will improve that for all registries. has made many unique improvements to speed and functionality since launching over a year ago.

8. Acceptance
It will be true of all registries that critical mass is … well, critical. Fortunately for photographers, legitimate registries will all be non-exclusive. Adding images to can be done by putting simple code on your web site that automatically registers all of your images. It couldn’t be easier.

Rights holders benefit the most today from registries while statutory damages are still in full force and unaffected by possible orphan works legislation. With new registries joining The Copyright Registry at in the marketplace, photographers can only win by this expanded pool of service providers.


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: